Thursday, February 12, 2015

Blog 1

            Reviewing my first so-called "on-site" week shadowing an attorney, I realized that attorneys aren't often on-site. Bustling back and forth between varied venues this week defied my initial expectations of a more sedentary job. Besides learning some fundamentals of the law and civil procedure, I was impressed by how important a role the soft skills of communication and psychology  play in the practice of law.

Monday:

            On Monday, to prepare me for the day's agenda, the civil defense lawyer who I am shadowing gave me a legal primer on the difference between tort law and statutory law. A cause of action is a set of facts justifying the right to sue. Statutory law is based on federal or state statutes defining a cause of action; tort law is based on the "reasonably prudent person under the same circumstance" standard. The day's issue concerned statutory law--Arizona's "dog at large" statute, in which the owner of a unleashed dog is strictly liable if an injured plaintiff brings suit within one year. Because it is statutory law, the plaintiff does not need to prove that the dog owner acted reasonably.
            Next,  we arrived at the plaintiff's law firm to conduct a deposition-- a meeting attended by both parties' attorneys to take the sworn statement of a party or witness to a lawsuit that is conducted through a question and answer format, similar to cross-examination at trial. Attending a deposition of the female plaintiff claiming to be injured by a neighbor's dog, I observed how attorneys cross-examine claimants to make a written record of their testimony that is admissible in court. Attorneys seek to get yes-or-no direct answers, therefore they narrowly frame their questions. I also saw how attorneys interact with opposing counsel--what is known as professionalism. For example, requests for medical records or diaries were made politely, rather than aggressively demanded. Because the plaintiff was emotional and disputed the accuracy of her medical records, questioning was difficult and sensitivity was required.
            After the sworn deposition of the plaintiff, both counsels discussed settlement and further handling of the case, including experts and independent medical and psychological exams. This settlement discussion was followed up with a visit to the Apache Junction Justice Court to find an injunction against harassment that the plaintiff sought against the defendant, our client, for a subsequent incident alleging intimidation with a car and to gather documents on the dog incident.
            Later, we met with his client, the defendant in the dog incident, to interview him at his home and also to interview two other witnesses there. An attorney is required to receive permission before he can make any offer of settlement on the client's behalf. The client gave his permission to enter into a binding arbitration high-low agreement (Alternative Dispute Resolution) to avoid a jury trial. By capping the plaintiff's damages, the attorney avoided the potentially excess policy limit jury verdict that he would be exposed to at trial.
            The plaintiff's damages depended on deciding causation--what injury was caused by the incident--and aggravation--if her pre-existing injuries and stress were compounded by the incident. I learned the difference between "a" cause (meaning one of many causes) and "the" cause (a but-for single cause of the injury) when measuring liability.

Tuesday:

            Heading up north to Prescott to the Yavapai County Superior Court, the attorney and I meet with his client, a twenty-four-year-old male charged with DUI and aggravated assault from a car accident, facing 4 months in jail and 5 years of probation. We were not dealing with his criminal claims; we were explaining to him his situation and what we were trying to accomplish as it relates to criminal restitution claims. We filed pleadings in the court to get a court order deeming the client's criminal restitution satisfied by using the client's insurance coverage to reach a global settlement of all claims.
            Leaving the court house, we encountered a press conference and memorial honoring Kayla Mueller, the humanitarian aid worker from Prescott who was kidnapped by ISIL and confirmed dead the prior day. Sadly, unlike his client, it's going to take more than a court order to rectify that grievous situation.
            Afterwards, we made a detour to inspect another accident scene in Prescott Valley, observing the timing sequence of a traffic light and evaluating liability.

Wednesday:

            At an early morning meeting in the Phoenix law office where I am interning, I sat in on my attorney's consultation regarding an excess policy limit exposure and a minor's settlement, which lasted about 1.5 hours. Because the minor, who was a driver in a major car accident, was about my age, I found the issues relatable.
            Next, we conducted an investigation in an attempt to locate a potential claimant. Successful, we were able to contact him to explain the situation and obtain his cooperation. After we made a quick stop to tour the courtrooms at the Maricopa County Superior Court, the main courthouse in Phoenix, we visited the adjacent Law Library to gather information on how I can sign onto legal search engines for my SRP research.
            Finally, we attended a court hearing regarding the reasonableness of another minor's settlement. After preparing the clients for about 45 minutes, we attended the conservatorship hearing, which was fairly routine because it was not contested, but provided a glimpse of the rules of civil procedure in action. I sat at counsels table and was introduced to the judge. Afterwards, we accompanied the client to the clerk's office to have letters of conservatorship issued and then to a bank to set up a restricted account for the minor's settlement.

Research


            I started accumulating contact information for the high schools which I will survey about school censorship. In Maricopa County alone, there are over 380 public high schools. Finding email addresses is proving difficult. Most schools just list phone numbers and mail addresses. I've discovered a few schools which have established policies declaring their school publications to be public forums, which is promising. 

10 comments:

  1. Wow, Michael! You have had an incredible first week! I am amazed by all that you were able to experience and the variety of situations. It must have been quite overwhelming to see the Kayla Mueller memorial and to consider the global impact of law and policy, as well as its limitations.

    Are you enjoying the travelling to different sites to collect information, or do you prefer performing work in the office? I bet that you have interesting conversations in the car! Some of my favorite memories are driving in a squad car to the courthouse with an officer and hearing his stories. Of course, I was simply a passenger and in no legal trouble! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do enjoy traveling to different sites, especially meeting clients from different walks of life and learning about facts of the cases. Talking with my father before and after meetings really puts the issues into context and helps me think like a lawyer.

      Delete
  2. Michael, I very much look forward to following your blog. I was an editor of a high school student newspaper in the late 80s and faced some blowback from the Hazelwood decision. Also, my father was a 1st Amendment scholar and wrote a lot about freedom of the press -- I suspect he has some work on Hazelwood, Tinker, etc. I will see if I can find anything in his body of work that you might find interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Since you were a high school student editor in the 1980s, I bet that you find it pretty incredible that the Hazelwood standard is still standing after 27 years. I was surprised that a more definitive U.S. Supreme Court ruling hasn't been issued in light of the wide difference in district court and circuit court opinions. With freedom of the press playing such a prominent role recently regarding the Charlie Hebdo cartoon and The Interview, censorship at home should probably be reevaluated too. I'm glad you're interested in my project, and, hopefully, I'll discover some insights about high school freedom of speech in Arizona.

      Delete
  3. Michael that sounds amazing!! Are there any laws you've found that you've disagreed with so far during your internship?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So far all the laws sound reasonable. Learning about the laws makes you think about all the things that can go wrong!

      Delete
  4. Wow, I would have never expected you to be following around this lawyer to all the consultations and the like, but it sounds like you've learnt a lot from just a week. I think for surveying the public schools, it may be best to just give them a call and see if you can talk directly to the students running the paper or a faculty member running it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I'm shadowing my father, so he basically takes me with him to all his meetings. I've been working on the phone calls, but the volume of high schools is surprisingly large. Calling is easy; receiving return calls is a little more difficult!

      Delete
  5. Hi Michael! What an exciting week! It sounds like your lawyer does a lot of running around; are you interested in that fast-paced life as an attorney? At the law office where I am interning, I have been mostly at the office; however, I tag along whenever an attorney has an opportunity to take me to court. I have been to a hearing, a trial, I have observed a deposition, and today I will be observing another hearing. It sounds like at some point we will probably run into each other! What are the different types of law that your attorney practices primarily? I am very eager to follow your progress and read about your experiences over the next two months!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He focuses on civil defense, primarily defending municipalities and insurance companies. Once in a while, he will accept a plaintiff's case.

      Delete